The Amazing Spider-Man (Review)

WILL the Amazing Spider-Man impress audiences once more? Or will it be more of the same old story? Jamie-maree Shipton finds outs. 

The Amazing Spider-Man boasts a new origin story, a new love interest, and new talent.

But I couldn’t help but feel like I was hit by a nasty case of deja-vu.

There isn’t a whole lot of ‘amazing-ness’ associated with watching the same movie twice. But that’s what it felt like watching the new Spider-Man movie.

I left with no greater or more in-depth understanding of the origin of Spider-man than what the previous film had already given me.

At every twist and turn I knew where the plot was going. I knew the beginning, middle and end, or at least I could make an educated guess at what would ensue.

For instance the climatic scene of Uncle Ben’s death was almost exactly the same as the Toby Maguire tear jerker: the malevolent actions of Peter Parker ignoring a crime results in Uncle Bill’s murder and the spiral into finding the murderer and discovering his role as a superhero crime fighter.

And the déjà-vu didn’t stop there.

Emma Stone plays Spider-Man's first love interest, Gwen.

The characters in this new Spider-man movie fit the same mould as every other from the previous releases – apart than the obvious difference in heroine Gwen, played by Emma Stone.

Even then, Stone carries the same jilted love for Parker as Mary-Jane, and wears the same cutesy get-up.

Then there is the villain, and again he is green and a monster. He is also a colleague of Parker’s father and becomes his role model who then betrays him.

Surprised? I wasn’t either.

So much more could have also come out of a movie shot in 3D. I was more conscious of the glasses’ frames sitting on the bridge of my nose than the big 3D action scenes.

Having said all that, I did find Andrew Garfield to be the better Spider-man. The jump between loner to charismatic hero was not so farfetched as it felt with the excessively introverted spider-man of Toby Maguire.

The humorous quirks of this film’s Spider-man is also more true to the quick-wit and sarcasm of the ‘original’ Spider-man stories. Garfield’s wit didn’t feel so manufactured and I assume that’s why I found him more believable.

Andrew Garfield, the better Spider-Man? Photo: Jaimie Trueblood

I’d go so far as to state the film could simply be labelled as a remake.

But one I did enjoy more than the predecessor, don’t get me wrong.

The younger talent and effects revitalises the story, but in the end I’m afraid it is a case of ‘old dog, new tricks’.

1 comment on this postSubmit yours
  1. What a stupid review… What was you waiting for ?? That´s is the comics story… You wanted a different beginning or different Uncle’s Ben dead ?? It´s obvious that every producer makes it´s own version and nobody cares the True comic book story. This movie won’t win an Oscar but it´s a lot better than the previous Spideman.

Submit your comment

Please enter your name

Please enter a valid email address

Please enter your message


Meld Magazine was incorporated as an independent not-for-profit media outlet in September 2008 to reach out to international students in Melbourne, and provide students the opportunity to gain real work experience.

Many international students live in or around the city because of the proximity to their colleges and universities, and that was where we decided to focus our efforts first. Many of us live, work and study locally too. Our editorial team is made of both local and international students, and it has worked to our advantage in providing local content in every sense of the word.

Meld Magazine – Melbourne's international student news website © 2017 All Rights Reserved